<blockquote>Journalists have a lot to learn from other disciplines about tracking what works. We're not used to gauging our success in ways more sophisticated than ratings or circulation numbers, and we're behind the measurement curve. But these days, it's hard to value what you can't measure. And as newsrooms grapple with how to make room in tight budgets for audience engagement, it's natural that they'd also wonder what the return on that investment might be.

With these issues in mind, a group of journalists invested in audience engagement gathered in early May at the Reynolds Journalism Institute to talk specifically about measurement (<a href="http://www.rjionline.org/events/engagement-metric" target="_blank">http://www.rjionline.org/events/engagement-metric</a>). Some of them were widely recognized experts. All were working to effect change in their traditional newsrooms or products. They came because they believe that as news organizations fight for survival, a more connected relationship with their communities should be valued, and therefore measured. They were joined by smart folks from other disciplines who shared their time to help guide the discussions and share their expertise.

Our multi-disciplinary group (see bios of some of the folks involved) focused our conversations around specific strategies for audience engagement, what their value is to the news organizations, and how the success of the efforts can be evaluated. We spent a day filling out a google spreadsheet together, and what you'll find here is an edited version of that document. It's not intended as a comprehensive guide to engagement, but instead as a sampling of practical ways to be strategic in our efforts." <strong>Source</strong>: <a href="http://www.rjionline.org/news/resource-newsrooms-measuring-success-audience-engagement-efforts-0">Reynolds Journalism Institute</a></blockquote>