<h2><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1193" title="socialmedia" src="/pullinc/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/socialmedia.gif" alt="" width="451" height="392" /></h2>
<h2>The number one topic and trend many CMO’s are integrating into their marketing mix is the use of social media. Marketers are trying to figure out how to get their brands invited to the social conversation, so they can do more marketing. In my view, social marketing is an oxymoron.</h2>
Marketing is not exactly a “social” activity. Often, it’s a rude interruption. Regardless, the term “social media marketing” is now firmly established in our current marketing lexicon.  Many marketers continue to struggle with determining which discipline owns the social media effort within their organizations. Is it in the domain of advertising, PR, HR, IT? Social media, for all the attention it receives, is still largely a jump ball. The new breed of folks who will drive, create and maintain marketing communication content through all the social media platforms are still unformed and mainly siloed .  Who ever owns the social media initiatives, the big job is to get the marketer embedded in the “social”, and once there, pile on the  “marketing”.  The truth is consumers are not listening. Here’s why:

<strong>There is no place for marketing in social media</strong>.

Think about being at a party having an enjoyable conversation with someone of like mind, then some annoying person interrupts your conversation to tell you how great they are and why you should engage with them. This is basically what most  “social marketing” really is.  People hate being interrupted.

Most marketers now hire some form of  “digital” advertising agency to provide the expertise to execute marketing campaigns in the social media space.  Here’s what most marketers and their agencies do not get–digital advertising is still advertising!  Advertising is an interruption. More so within the context of our user controlled, crowd-sourcing social web.  The social web is a real live conversation. It’s not a media pipe that marketers can own to shove messages through.

As a “media business”, Facebook and Twitter (the most successful social platforms) are still not big money-making media businesses like their traditional cousins (TV, print, outdoor) have been. I’m not suggesting they won’t be highly profitable someday, but right now they’re not. The reason is simple–the social web is by invitation only and marketing messages are not welcome. All of the social media platforms continue to struggle with the design of an advertising revenue business model that will not destroy the fabric of the social conversation they have thus far enabled.

<strong>There are exceptions</strong>.

This is not to say that marketing messages don’t go “viral”– many do. Unlike the social sharing platforms, YouTube  (and other video sharing portals) are now pretty close to being what traditional broadcast has always been. The only difference is the ability for people to pass the content links around. Sharing links is the social part. What makes content worthy of being shared is usually associated with an entertainment value, not necessarily the marketer’s embedded sales proposition. However, entertaining people is not enough to earn admission to the tribe.

<a href="http://cdn.visiblemeasures.com/youtube/chromeful/popup520x400.html?video=XQcVllWpwGs" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1194" title="baby" src="/pullinc/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/baby.gif" alt="" width="515" height="290" /></a>The Evian babies spot above is a good example of an entertaining viral message. Because of it’s paid-placement, the spot has been viewed by nearly 2 million people on YouTube. A case could be made that it was a successful test because the marketer has decided to roll it out into traditional broadcast media. To me, this is just traditional paid advertising re-purposed. I wouldn’t call this social media marketing because it’s not a two-way conversation.

<strong>How to get invited to the conversation</strong>.

Marketers want to get consumers “engaged” with their brand, and the web is where most of us are these days.  You don’t get invited to the real conversation by plastering blinking banners everywhere. Social media is about contribution and sharing, not selling. It’s about being an invited participant to a tribal conversation because you have first added value to the tribe. The best way to get invited is to be trusted. Brands earn trust just like people do– keep your promises, be cool to people, add value to the tribe first, make a difference over time.  Nothing new here. A recent post from <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/04/08/social-media-real-world-action/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+mashable%2Fbusiness+%28Mashable+%C2%BB+Business%29" target="_blank">Mashable The Social Media Guide</a> offers an interesting story on how a few brands are using social media to create real world connections. You may find that interesting as well. When your value proposition is a welcome part of the conversation, it’s  value will naturally be shared with others, When that happens you’re no  longer marketing, you’re contributing. When you're contributing you'll  be remarkable. We used to call this good 'ol word-of-mouth.

<strong>How is your brand contributing to the tribe in which it seeks to  belong?</strong>