As someone who uses the technology on a daily basis i can openly and honestly say that Sandra is mostly wrong. I do not know internally how Erchonia works but i know how the Zerona works and it works really well. The results are amazing. You can't expect to take someone who been eating cheese burgers daily for the past 20 years and make them skinny like a model but you can expect to lose anywhere between 3 to 20 inches in a month of treatments. It is of course measureless of about 3 different areas taken together. If you look in the market today the best non invasive (sometimes painful) other technologies out there provide something like 1-3 cm (not inches) of reduction for only a single area. If you check how much reduction you get with a real lipo surgery you would often find that you will get higher reduction with the Zerona than the surgery. People however are not objective and a change (with pain) that occurred when you went to sleep and then woke up seems more real than a change that happened without any pain and any risks and any negative side effects that occurred over a few weeks. That is why we take measurements and photos, to show people what they can't always see themselves.

A monkey can operate it? I have had to let go quite a few people who couldn't operate it the proper way and they weren't a monkey.

Obviously you have no idea how the industry work. The reason why there are consent form like when doing a medical procedure is because in most places in the world, laser is considered something that can cause damage so in many places by law you have to have nurses and doctors who are responsible for the operations and in the all the places you have insurance companies that tell you that if a customer doesn't sign a consent form, you will not be insured if something happens.

Many negative reviews? There has been thousands over thousands of people who did the Zerona already, out of them you see what 40 reviews? Out of them only 25 are bad? Unhappy people will run to tell about it far more than happy people, so if 10,000 people did the treatment (the number is much much higher) and we know that it doesn't work on about 5% of the population, then you already have 500 people who it shouldn't be working on and yet only 25 negative reviews?